Hong Kong judge cites officer’s inconsistent accounts, failure to note ‘confessions’ in ruling for alleged protest poster duo
- Senior Constable Lau Yick-pang was taken to task for ‘fickle’ testimony after his account of events surrounding the arrests changed
- The two students were accused of taping protest posters to a bridge on Tsing Yi Island on a day of citywide strike action
Two students accused of taping protest posters to government property were acquitted on Tuesday, after a court found the police officer who arrested them had not followed proper procedure in doing so.
Special Magistrate Lau Suk-han of West Kowloon Magistracy also attributed the acquittal to the “fickle” testimony of Senior Constable Lau Yick-pang, who she said had given inconsistent accounts of the event on August 5, a day of citywide strike action.
Lau Yick-pang told the court he had witnessed the students, Ho Chi-ching and Kwok Hiu-nam, posting three placards calling for people to join the strike on a bridge railing on Tsing Yi Island that evening.
The officer said the duo had then admitted their wrongdoings upon arrest. However, under cross-examination, he conceded he had failed to note down their confessions in accordance with Police General Orders.
Announcing her verdict, the magistrate said she found the officer’s evidence unreliable, pointing out the lack of proof that the purported confessions had been made by the students.
“The admission was never recorded in writing in the officer’s notebook. In court, the officer explained he failed to mention it,” Lau Suk-han said.