Advertisement
Hong Kong courts
Hong KongLaw and Crime

Hong Kong protests: High Court orders magistrate to revisit acquittal of couple who taunted man later set on fire

  • High Court rules Chan Hoi-wan and husband Kwong Yiu-man wrongly acquitted of disorderly conduct in public due to misinterpretation of law
  • Middle-aged construction worker was set ablaze by radical protesters during demonstration in Ma On Shan on November 11, 2019

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Supporters use umbrellas to shield Kwong Yiu-man (khaki trousers) at Eastern Court in Sai Wan Ho in 2020. Photo: Winson Wong
Brian Wong
Hong Kong prosecutors have won an appeal over the acquittal of a couple who taunted a man before he was set on fire during the 2019 anti-government protests, with a judge sending the case back to the trial magistrate for reconsideration.
The High Court held on Friday that Chan Hoi-wan and her husband Kwong Yiu-man were wrongly acquitted of disorderly conduct in public due to a misinterpretation of the law.

But instead of ordering a retrial, Madam Justice Judianna Barnes asked the lower court to revisit its ruling based on the correct legal principles and facts already established during the original trial, taking into account the time that had elapsed since the incident on November 11, 2019.

The High Court has sent the case back to a magistrate for review. Photo: Warton Li
The High Court has sent the case back to a magistrate for review. Photo: Warton Li

She also reinstated the HK$1,000 (US$127) bail imposed on each of the accused before their acquittal and barred them from leaving Hong Kong until the trial magistrate ruled again on the matter.

A middle-aged construction worker, who cannot be identified due to an anonymity order, was set ablaze by radical protesters during a demonstration in Ma On Shan. He sustained severe burns but survived. The man had earlier given chase to vandals who trashed a railway station in the New Territories town.
Advertisement

Chan, 37, and Kwong, 42, were accused of verbally confronting the man on a footbridge in the lead-up to the incident “with intent to provoke a breach of the peace, or whereby a breach of the peace is likely to be caused”.

The Eastern Court trial in 2020 heard that Chan had told the victim to “go back to the Greater Bay Area”, a reference to cities in neighbouring Guangdong province, while Kwong had told the man to “get lost”.
Advertisement

In clearing the couple of disorderly conduct, Magistrate Arthur Lam Hei-wei cast doubt on the correlation between their taunts and the subsequent attack, adding he had difficulty finding the defendants’ actions were likely to have caused a breach of the peace.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x