Advertisement
Jimmy Lai trial
Hong KongLaw and Crime

Jimmy Lai trial: Hong Kong court rejects tycoon’s request to dismiss sedition charge in national security case

  • Trial adjourned until January 2, when court is expected to formally record Jimmy Lai’s plea and hear prosecution’s opening statement before witnesses take the stand
  • Lawyers for media tycoon had argued the charge was filed after the expiry of a six-month time limit

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
An officer and a police dog outside the court building. The force was out in numbers again on the third day of the trial. Photo: Jonathan Wong
Brian WongandEdith Lin
This story has been made freely available as a public service to our readers. Please consider supporting SCMP’s journalism by subscribing.
A Hong Kong court has rejected media tycoon Jimmy Lai Chee-ying’s request to dismiss a sedition charge in his national security trial, leaving open the prospect of his conviction for the colonial-era offence as prosecutors look set to begin their case in the new year.

Lai on Friday returned to West Kowloon Court before 8am, appearing a few hours later in front of three High Court judges to hear their ruling ahead of the next stage of his 80-day trial.

Advertisement

Wearing a navy blue blazer and a white cloth around his neck, Lai nodded and smiled at his family upon entering the dock.

Madam Justice Esther Toh Lye-ping said the bench found prosecutors had not violated criminal procedures when they laid the sedition charge against Lai, dismissing contentions by the tycoon’s legal team that it was filed too late.

Jimmy Lai’s legal team arrives at court. Lawyers for the 76-year-old had asked judges to strike out a count of conspiracy relating to the tabloid newspaper’s allegedly seditious publications. Photo: Sam Tsang
Jimmy Lai’s legal team arrives at court. Lawyers for the 76-year-old had asked judges to strike out a count of conspiracy relating to the tabloid newspaper’s allegedly seditious publications. Photo: Sam Tsang

Lawyers for the 76-year-old founder of the now-defunct Apple Daily tabloid earlier asked the judges to strike out the count relating to the newspaper’s allegedly seditious publications between April 2019 and June 2021. They argued the charge was laid after the expiry of a six-month time limit for filing a complaint under the city’s criminal code.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x