Hong Kong judges question whether Jimmy Lai’s letter campaign to Donald Trump an attempt to trigger diplomatic action
- Jimmy Lai’s legal team argues letter campaign kicked off to convince China to take back decision to impose national security law on city
- But prosecution witness Cheung Kim-hung says campaign designed to attract US sanctions against China

The court earlier heard the now-defunct Apple Daily tabloid promoted the idea “Trump saves Hong Kong” in various print and digital advertisements in May 2020, which contained a template letter for petitioning the US politician, as well as ways to draw his attention to the city.

Ex-publisher Cheung Kim-hung, a defendant turned prosecution witness, testified that the campaign was designed to attract US sanctions against China.
Defence Senior Counsel Robert Pang Yiu-hung, however, said Lai’s true intent was to prevent the central authorities from taking “a disastrous course of action”.
“What was sought in that letter was the ‘public support and the diplomatic efforts of the United States’, nothing more than that,” the lawyer said.
That submission raised eyebrows on the bench. Madam Justice Esther Toh Lye-ping, one of three High Court judges hearing the case, said the open letter was a request to Trump rather than the central government.