bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

sponsorType

authorLocations

authors

paywallTypes

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

socialHeadline

headline

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

publishedDate

additionalInfoBoxes

images

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

createdDate

sponsor

factSheets

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

copyrighted

customTimezone

liveContents

Ng Kang-chung

Danny Mok

A new move by the Companies Registry meant to protect the privacy of those serving as company directors has backfired, sparking concerns about a possible curb on corporate transparency and the free flow of information.
Under the new arrangement, which came into effect on Sunday, users seeking particulars of registered companies or their directors through the registry’s online search service must ­declare a reason for doing so.
And they may expose themselves to legal risks should they not use the personal data collected for the purpose they have ­declared.
Hong Kong political party finds its name Demosisto has been registered ... as a game
The registry said the requirement was introduced to prevent the abuse of personal particulars in the wake of a privacy commission report last year. It also said the move was in line with the Companies Ordinance.
But reporters, academics and researchers have expressed reservations. The Hong Kong Journalists Association is expected to meet registry officials on Tuesday to discuss the arrangement.
Company searches have been a powerful tool for investigative reporting. In a recent example, the flat-swap deal scandal involving permanent secretary for home ­affairs Betty Fung Ching Suk-yee could not have been uncovered if the media had not been able to dig out particulars of the companies involved.
Corporate transparency advocate David Webb, who has been drawing together publicly available data to build databases of companies and organisations, said the move went against the global trend of enhanced transparency.
‘Privacy law will breed corruption’ warns journalists’ union
Webb said: “I see there is no checkbox for the purposes of journalism and research.
“It seems that in the wake of the Panama Papers, Hong Kong is seeking to move backwards ­towards greater secrecy, aiding and abetting fraud and corruption, at the same time as other countries are moving forward with transparency.
“Last year, the UK Companies Registry put everything online for free open access.”
Civic Party lawmaker Claudia Mo Man-ching said: “I think the Companies Registry should add ‘news reporting’ as an option … or it would be best if it restored the website as it was. [The public ­impression has been that] press freedom has been worsening in Hong Kong, and it was worrying and suspicious for the registry to make the change.”
Chinese University journalism professor Dr Clement So York-kee questioned why the change was needed. “I can’t really see how such a requirement is helping to protect personal privacy … yet it could be an obstacle for journalists and residents.”
“It is also unfavourable for the free flow of information in society and for journalists to do their job as society’s monitor.”
At the centre of the controversy are nine purposes a user must choose from. Six of the listed purposes are about whether the searcher has any dealing with a company or its directors. Others include ascertaining the particulars of a company, its directors or former directors.
The user can check one or more of the purposes and also has to affirm that “the personal data obtained from the search should only be used for the stated purposes”. No one can use the register without a declared reason.
Privacy Commissioner Stephen Wong Kai-yi said the registry had struck a balance between the protection of privacy and access to information.
“There is no need for journalists to be overly worried,” said Wong, citing exemptions in the privacy law that cover, among other things, news activities and archiving.
However, he agreed that an extra checkbox for “news reporting in the public interest” could be considered if reporters believed it could offer them better protection for their work. But it would be up to the registry whether to adopt it or not, he said.
Additional reporting by Tony Cheung and Gary Cheung



Jimmy Lai tells court he could have fled Hong Kong in 2020 but chose to stay

Hong Kong’s Jimmy Lai denies inciting others to breach the national security law

Hong Kong’s Jimmy Lai urged US to start ‘war of competing values’ against Beijing

Jimmy Lai wanted US to impose ‘draconian’ sanctions to stop Hong Kong’s security law

Press freedom in Hong Kong

Hong Kong journalists and academics fear new requirement when using online companies register

Users are now required to tell the registrar why they are searching for company information. Photo: May Tse

News

Hong Kong

Law and Crime

Need to declare reason for search means reporters and members of the public could be exposed to legal risks
