Advertisement
Hong Kong Basic Law
Hong KongPolitics

Beijing’s review of Hong Kong Basic Law necessary to restore order, mainland adviser says

Peking University expert also agrees with timing of intervention, while People’s Daily hails ruling and chief executive says no plans yet for by-election

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Jiang Shigong, deputy director of Peking University’s Centre for Hong Kong and Macau Studies, says the timing of the intervention was apt. Photo: SCMP
Danny Mok,Jeffie LamandTony Cheung
The interpretation of the Basic Law by China’s top legislative body was conducted in line with the “principle of necessity”, a leading mainland advisor on Hong Kong affairs says.

Jiang Shigong, deputy director of Peking University’s Centre for Hong Kong and Macau Studies, said it should be noted that this interpretation by the National People’s Congress Standing Committee, which pre-empted a judicial review ruling by the Hong Kong court, was not a show of disrespect or lack of trust.

“The timing of this interpretation is based on the principle of necessity in the common law, which the Hong Kong legal sector should be familiar with,” Jiang said. He was a researcher in the central government’s liaison office in Hong Kong from 2004 to 2008.

Advertisement

Jiang was referring to the common law system that Hong Kong retained even after the 1997 handover.

Advertisement

The timing of the interpretation was also because operations in the Legislative Council had come to a standstill over the oath row, Jiang said.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x