Advertisement
Advertisement
Hong Kong protests
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Democratic Party lawmaker Lam Cheuk-ting displays the letter he received from police thanking him for ‘fulfilling’ his responsibility in reporting the crime. Photo: Edmond So

Hong Kong opposition lawmaker injured in Yuen Long station attack accuses police of shutting him out as witness

  • Democratic Party lawmaker Lam Cheuk-ting questions why the force cancelled his appointment to give a further statement on one of the most controversial episodes of last year’s social unrest
  • Lam says his arrest on rioting charge stemming from same incident has only strengthened his resolve to serve as legislator in extended term

A Hong Kong opposition lawmaker charged with rioting over a mob attack at the Yuen Long MTR station last year has accused police of trying to undermine his credibility as a witness in another case.

Lam Cheuk-ting was speaking on Friday, a day after he and six others were released on bail over the violence on July 21 last year that became one of the most controversial episodes of last year’s social unrest.

The Democratic Party legislator was at the station when a group of white-clad men armed with steel rods and rattan canes assaulted passengers and protesters. Lam suffered an injury to his mouth that required 18 stitches.

He gave a statement days later, but was arrested himself on Wednesday, with police saying the year-long narrative over the case as an “indiscriminate attack” by one group upon another was wrong. Instead it had been a clash between two sides, according to a senior superintendent.

“I am very worried that the authorities would reject using my testimony and reject me attending court to testify against those attackers,” Lam said. “In the end, would the attackers be released through the lack of evidence?”

He added that officers had arranged to take further testimony last month, after he held a press conference saying he had more video clips and information about the attack.

But Lam said an officer called and cancelled the appointment on July 29, the day he expected to give another statement. The policeman said his colleague had to undergo a Covid-19 test.

On August 6, Lam’s office received a letter from police, thanking him for “fulfilling a citizen’s responsibility in reporting this serious crime to the police”, and they had not rescheduled a time to see him since then. The cases against the white-clad suspects are set to start in the District Court in February next year.

“I believe since the end of last month, my role as a key witness has been changed to a defendant,” Lam said.

Anger over the attack in Yuen Long resurfaced after the arrests on Wednesday, when police held a press conference and offered a different version of events inside the MTR station.

Challenging previous media reports of the incident, Senior Superintendent Chan Tin-chu of the New Territories North regional headquarters said a police investigation concluded both sides were “on equal footing” in their use of force.

Senior Superintendent Chan Tin-chu of the New Territories North regional headquarters. Photo: Nora Tam
Police Commissioner Chris Tang Ping-keung sought to defuse public anger on Thursday, saying the force should avoid making unnecessary statements. But Lam said he believed Chan’s remarks had been endorsed by his bosses.

Calvin So, a chef believed to have been the first person attacked, said he was hit by a group of 20 men outside a shopping centre connected to the railway station, and questioned the police version of events.

“I was beaten by a big group of people, how equal footing can it be?” he said. “The group of white-shirted men gathered around as early as 6pm or 7pm, and I was beaten before 10pm. My case has proved [the police’s] script to be not sensible.”

Lam said his arrest had bolstered his determination to serve in the Legislative Council’s extended term after elections were postponed due to the coronavirus pandemic.

The opposition camp has been divided over whether lawmakers should stay, with some arguing they must hold the administration accountable, while others are pushing for a boycott.

“If we all withdraw from Legco, I believe our voice would be weakened and even silenced,” Lam said.

As a lawmaker, he received international media attention and had used his position to question officials and the government, he said, adding: “We have to keep this shed of light, no matter how weak it becomes.”

The Democratic Party plans to carry out a survey to gauge the public’s view on whether lawmakers should continue to serve in Legco, and the results will be respected, Lam vowed.

Labour Party lawmaker Fernando Cheung Chiu-hung earlier said the arrest of Lam and others had forced him to reconsider staying on as a legislator. The government was ready to “rewrite anything and completely subdue themselves under the command of mainland officials”, Cheung said.

During a special Legco House Committee meeting on the latest pandemic response measures, a group of opposition lawmakers held up placards and chanted slogans accusing authorities of “turning black into white”. All but two pan-democrats – who support boycotting the extended term – attended the meeting, alongside Chief Secretary Matthew Cheung Kin-chung and nine ministers.

When asked by reporters about the recent arrests, he said it would be up to the courts to handle as any prosecution must be based on evidence.

This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: Officers shut me out as witness, says opposition lawmaker hurt in attack
Post