Advertisement
Advertisement
Shooting instructor Charles Vacca stands next to a 9-year-old girl at the Last Stop shooting range in White Hills. He was accidentally shot and killed by the girl with a Uzi gun when the weapon's strong recoil caused her to lose control of her aim. Photo: Reuters

Uzi girl's shooting of instructor shows up lax gun laws and attitudes in US

Most US states let children fire guns, even if some may be too young to understand how

WASHPOST

In the wake of the accidental death of a gun instructor in the United States, many people will question why the nine-year-old girl who pulled the trigger was even allowed to hold and fire an automatic machine gun.

But gun laws - specifically those concerning minimum legal age requirements for gun possession - are surprisingly lax.

Federal law prohibits handgun ownership by any person under the age of 18, with a handful of exceptions. But there is no minimum age for long gun (rifle and shotgun) ownership.

Twenty states and the District of Columbia have set their own minimum age laws ranging from 14 in Montana to 21 in Illinois, but in the remaining 30 states it is technically legal for a child to possess a long gun.

That doesn't mean that a child can walk into a gun show and purchase a gun.

"There are federal laws for minimum age purchasing of firearms," said Daniel Webster, the director of the Johns Hopkins Centre for Gun Policy and Research. "Technically, anybody selling a gun in that context should look for age verification that someone is at least 18 years old."

But a child's parent could. "If dad wants to give his son a rifle or a shotgun on his 13th or 14th birthday, he's pretty much free to do that in most states," Webster said.

It's also perfectly legal in many states for children to fire guns of all types at shooting ranges, like the one in Arizona where the accidental shooting took place on Tuesday, so long as an adult or instructor is present.

The gun used at the shooting range incident, an Uzi, is a submachine gun that could be classified as either a handgun or a long gun depending on the model and any modifications to the gun. While federal law would prohibit minors from owning the pistol version of the gun, there are no such federal restrictions on the rifle version.

"The laws aren't designed in essence to protect children from accidental shootings of this nature," Webster said. "There's a mindset that's fairly prevalent in the US that there's nothing wrong with kids firing guns."

The industry pitch for the gun has revolved around the efficiency of its operation and thrill of its use. "Shooting the Uzi pistol is just pure, economical recreation with a tonne of fun thrown in," Richard Turner, the vice-president of sales and marketing for Umarex USA, which manufactures the gun, told the magazine in 2012.

Webster believes that there are both cognitive and physical limitations that make it more difficult for children to understand and apply the gun-safety rules they are taught from a young age.

"A very common view of gun-owning parents is that what gun safety is all about is teaching your children rules," he said. "What they don't consider are the developmental issues and physical abilities of children to actually follow these instructions.

"It was obvious to me when I saw this nine-year-old girl holding an incredibly powerful gun like an Uzi. Why anyone was surprised when she couldn't handle the recoil is beyond me."

The National Rifle Association did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: Lax laws and attitudes behind girl's Uzi accident
Post