Advertisement
Advertisement
US immigration
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Hundreds of protesters denounce the travel ban from Muslim-majority countries enacted by US President Donald Trump outside the international terminal at Los Angeles International Airport. Photo: EPA

Judge blocks part of Trump’s immigration ban for those in US

Trump’s pronouncement on Muslim immigration makes good on one of his most controversial campaign promises to subject travellers from Islamic countries to ‘extreme vetting’

A federal judge blocked Saturday part of President Donald Trump’s temporary immigration ban, ordering authorities to stop deporting refugees and other travelers stuck at US airports.

“Victory!!!!!!” the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), whose lawyers sued the government, tweeted after US District Judge Ann Donnelly issued her decision.

“Our courts today worked as they should as bulwarks against government abuse or unconstitutional policies and orders.”

Trump’s sweeping executive order, signed Friday, suspends the arrival of refugees for at least 120 days and bars visas for travellers from seven Muslim majority countries for the next three months.

The move, which was implemented immediately by US authorities, sparked large protests at major airports across the country. At New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport, some of the 2,000 demonstrators chanted “Let them in, let them in!”

Watch: Trump's refugee ban sparks outrage across United States

Donnelly’s decision to issue a temporary stay - which stopped short of ruling on the constitutionality of Trump’s order - concerns dozens of people who were detained at US airports following Trump’s actions.

The exact number of those affected is unclear, but the judge ordered the government to provide lists of all those detained at US airports since the measure went into effect.

Sending those travellers back to their home countries following Trump’s order exposes them to “substantial and irreparable injury,” wrote Donnelly, who was appointed by Trump’s Democratic predecessor Barack Obama.

US President Donald Trump said his order was not a ‘Muslim ban’. Photo: AP

Trump’s pronouncement on Muslim immigration makes good on one of his most controversial campaign promises to subject travellers from Islamic countries to “extreme vetting,” which he declared would make America safe from “radical Islamic terrorists.”

The targeted countries are Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

Donnelly’s decision shows that “when President Trump enacts laws or executive orders that are unconstitutional, and illegal, the courts are there to defend everyone’s rights,” ACLU executive director Anthony Romero said in leaving the emergency hearing.

But the battle is far from over, and another hearing was set for next month.

“At minimum, they will not be returned to danger,” said ACLU lawyer Lee Gelernt.

“The key tonight was making sure nobody was put back on a plane.”

Protesters gather at O'Hare International Airport after more than a dozen were detained, including green card holders in Chicago. Photo: AP

More than 170 travellers have been denied entry to the United States a day after Trump signed the executive order suspending immigration from seven Muslim-majority countries.

Citing the purpose of blocking terrorists, Trump signed the order Friday suspending entry of travellers from Syria, Yemen, Sudan, Somalia, Iraq, Iran and Libya for 90 days and that of refugees from any country for 120 days.

CNN has reported the suspension covers a total of about 134 million people. A US official said Saturday that even Green Card holders from the seven countries may also be subject to the entry ban.

Following the order, two refugees who assisted US forces in Iraq were detained after arriving at New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport on Friday. They were later released and allowed entry to the United States.

Additional reporting by Kyodo

This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: airports brace for more fury over ban
Post