Letters | Cambodia is committed to peace on the border
Readers discuss the rules-based order in Southeast Asia, how to build Asean’s power, and the Israel-Iran ceasefire
Cambodia responded to this tragedy not with escalation but with restraint and principle, proposing that both nations submit the matter jointly to the International Court of Justice (ICJ). When that offer was declined, Cambodia chose to proceed with the ICJ independently, openly and in accordance with international law. The ICJ exists precisely to adjudicate such disputes.
Cambodia’s decision to approach the ICJ is not about reviving historical grievances or fanning nationalist flames. It is about preventing further loss of life, safeguarding regional stability and strengthening the rules-based order in Southeast Asia. The people who live along our shared frontier, Cambodians and Thais alike, are the ones most directly affected. When tensions rise, cross-border trade suffers, livelihoods are disrupted and fear takes hold.
The ICJ has ruled on this frontier before, and Cambodia respects that process. In 1962, the court determined that the Preah Vihear Temple lies on Cambodian territory, relying in part on a map drawn by French surveyors in 1907 and later formally acknowledged by Thai officials, who have used this map without objection for years. In 2013, the court reaffirmed Cambodia’s sovereignty over the temple and clarified that it includes the surrounding area necessary for access and protection. These legal principles continue to guide Cambodia’s peaceful approach today.
Notably, Cambodia is not producing rival maps or engaging in political grandstanding. We continue to rely on legal norms and remain open to technical cooperation in non-contested areas.