Letters | Hong Kong could help Asia set standards for AI in education
Readers discuss the integration of artificial intelligence into education, the risk of harm caused by AI, and the role of governments in the new geopolitical landscape
As AI tools enter our classrooms, we face critical questions about their quality, safety and educational value. Educators need clarity on the distinctions between AI, generative AI and proprietary AI tools for teaching and learning. Traditional AI in education, such as intelligent tutoring systems and adaptive learning platforms, differs fundamentally from generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, which in turn differ from specialised proprietary educational AI solutions.
Each category serves different purposes and requires different safeguards. The risk is that AI solutions will exacerbate existing problems in education systems without clear learning objectives and corresponding pedagogical changes. Technology alone cannot fix educational challenges; these require thoughtful integration with human-centred teaching approaches.
While Western markets benefit from established frameworks such as the ISTE Seal and Digital Promise certification, Asia lacks comprehensive quality assurance mechanisms. With its unique position as an East-meets-West education hub, Hong Kong can bridge this gap.