• Wed
  • Oct 29, 2014
  • Updated: 1:51pm
Tiananmen Square crackdown
NewsChina
POLITICS

Son of reformer Hu Yaobang rues lost chance for change, 25 years after his father’s death

Twenty-five years after the death of respected liberal Hu Yaobang, his son laments the lack of progress on political front and press freedom

PUBLISHED : Monday, 14 April, 2014, 11:41pm
UPDATED : Tuesday, 15 April, 2014, 6:14pm
 

China missed a golden opportunity for political reform in the 1980s and it is doubtful when the next one will come, says a son of Hu Yaobang, the widely respected late liberal leader, whose death helped trigger one of the largest democratic movements in modern China.

Speaking to the South China Morning Post ahead of the 25th anniversary today of his father's death, Hu Dehua lamented the lack of progress in political reform and the continued lack of protection for press freedom over ths last quarter century.

Hu Yaobang believed political reform had to go hand-in-hand with economic reform.

In 1986, he was planning a draft law to safeguard press freedoms, but was purged in 1987 before it could be enacted.

"Press freedom should have been the first step in political reform, but there is still no law on it … I guess it will never come out," Hu Dehua said.

Watch: 25 years on, China still remembers former Party leader Hu Yaobang

"When you have no law to protect these rights, everything is in the hands of the officials.

"Although we have a constitution which guarantees freedoms in speech and assembly… in fact, there are hardly any freedoms. We have no right to supervise [the government]."

He added: "Today, corruption among officials is impossible to rein in and ethnic tension is intense. There was a window for reform then [in the 1980s] but it was missed and I don't know when the next one will come."

Hu Yaobang's name has for years been taboo and mostly censored by official media.

Over the weekend, former president Hu Jintao - not related - made a surprise visit to Hu Yaobang's formal residence to pay a tribute. President Xi Jinping's father, Xi Zhongxun, was known as a key ally of Hu Yaobang.

Hu Dehua's comments carry weight because of the respect people still hold for his father - one of the most important leaders responsible for steering China out of the chaos of the Cultural Revolution and into the era of "reform and opening up".

Hu Yaobang died on April 15, 1989, from a heart attack, two years after being elbowed out of power by party conservatives for tolerating "bourgeois liberation".

Hundreds of thousands turned out on the streets to pay their respects. The spontaneous public mourning later transformed into a mass movement for democracy and freedom in Tiananmen Square, but was ended by a brutal military crackdown on June 4.

Hu Dehua said his father did not regret his loss of status, but was heartbroken when reforms that would have brought checks and balances on the power of the government were abandoned.

Hu said every country had at least one key national figure who had led the country towards great progress, and one person in Chinese history who has filled that role was either Sun Yat-sen, who led a revolution to topple the Qing dynasty, or Mao Zedong.

"It remains to be seen who that second person would be," he said. "Hu Yaobang could have been that person, but he was purged."

Twenty-five years after his death, Hu is still best remembered by many for his liberal boldness in freeing China from the strictures of Maoist dogma.

Hu Dehua said one of the most memorable exchanges he had with his father came at the height of the Cultural Revolution in 1968.

The senior Hu asked his teenage son whether he thought the popular slogan of the era - "Everything we do is for Chairman Mao; All our thoughts are of Chairman Mao; and in all our actions we closely follow and obey Chairman Mao" - was correct.

Having seen it published in state newspapers, the younger Hu said he did not question its veracity. "Can't you use your brains? This is clearly problematic," Hu quoted his father as saying. "Everything we do should be for the people, not for Mao."

Forty-six years later, Hu Dehua can still vividly recall how shocked he was when his father uttered these words. "It felt as if I'd been struck by lightning - people dared not speak like that in those days," Hu said of the decade that ensued, when criticism of Mao could result in persecution, prison or death.

"From that moment on, I knew my father was an exceptional man," Hu, 65, said. "He did not follow the herd."

It was perhaps that boldness that earned Hu Yaobang - the Communist Party's top leader from 1980 to 1987 - widespread respect among his countrymen, but also led to his downfall.

Apart from a low-key official ceremony commemorating the 90th anniversary of his birth in 2005, Hu Yaobang's name has scarcely been mentioned in the state press in the past 25 years.

"In the party's official history, it is as though he didn't exist," said Hu, adding that the party "lacks the magnanimity" to reverse its unjust verdict. Asked why he thought the party was reluctant to take the step, he said: "I guess they're afraid of equality, differing opinions and people's rights."

Hu Yaobang had a liberal and pragmatic approach to politics and economics.

As deputy head of the Central Party School and later the party's propaganda chief, he encouraged independent thinking, freeing China from ideological dogmatism and the worship of Mao when the country was still reeling from the Cultural Revolution.

Among the many legacies of his father, Hu Dehua is most proud of his advocacy of democracy and the rule of law, his opposition to repressive rule, his campaign to rehabilitate political victims and the abolition of discrimination against "black five categories" of so-called political enemies.

Hu Yaobang ended the requirement to declare one's class affiliation on official documents.

"People enjoyed freedom from fear for the first time," said Hu Dehua. "I reckon this contribution was no less than [Abraham] Lincoln's liberation of black slaves - he turned the politically condemned class into citizens."

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

7

This article is now closed to comments

lawrencexerrypaomey@yahoo.com
I truly respect Hu Yaobang for his passion and courage. But i disagree with his view on political system he proposed. When we talk about ideal society and its governance, It involves political science and philosophical knowledge. Having "Democracy" doesn't make you look good or have the moral high ground above other that is not "Democratic". It is hardly equivalent with freedom. Anarchism is freedom. But that if you want live in such society. Since there is no perfect governance.
liemcc22@gmail.com
there is no real democracy, only in america, united states, there is the so called elusive freedom and democracy. there is only a pursue of a democracy close to the united states'.
even the british, france, japan or other multi-parties system will only approach a high degree of democracy. or india, singapore, or taiwan.
i don't know mr hu, but i think he is a great political enthusiast and magnetic celebrity. corruption is a
manifestation and its form is different in different level and degree of freedom of speech... when a country becomes advanced corruption is called something else, but people are just happier.
freedom is about dialogue and freedom is a feeling that is a refreshing that you can get only in united states. because of its rights to bare arms to protect oneself. there will be checks against government.. the press, i repeat , the press will not be a check against the government as effective as the constitution to bare arms to protect oneself, that's why the american civil wars started. look, at japan, even with the highest gdp per capita, they are living in a society that worries too much for form rather than substance, that is precisely lack of freedom despite being such a superpower.
the japanese still admire the american way of life.....australia, and the other commonwealth countries are more racially inclined, with much racism going on. the idea of being a gentleman is important precisely out of lack of security and freedom.
Ant Lee
Communism = human sufferings
lawrencexerrypaomey@yahoo.com
Please grow up. You spout Communism like a buzzword without actually understanding the principles behind it and why they do not work.
hard times !
obviously, 25 years after the death of much-repsected liberal former leader, Mr.Hu Yaobong, both freedom of press and development of politics---moving towards a more democratic and open end, have both fail to realize.It is a regret in the eyes of both sons of Mr.Hu whose death triggered the large-scale student campaign in 1989 when the notorious June 4th Massacre took place.
lib_hk

True reformers should smile but Mr. Hu Sr. / Mr. Hu Jrs. never smile (and yet they think so highly of themselves)...China needs cool reformers (Mr. Xi at least manages a few smiles) not creditor-faced self-proclaimed reformer bigots...and we (and as well we SCMP) cannot thank Mr. Hu Sr. enough for destablising Tibet and Xinjiang...
lib_prc

Ludicrous claim. Mr. Hu Sr. was directly responsible for instability in Tibet and Xinjiang because of his disastrous ideas. The best time for reform in China is now not in the 1980s when he was running the show (classic case of the blind leading the blind)...
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or