To Gina Haspel, Donald Trump’s nominee for CIA director: is torture immoral today?
Based on her compelling testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Haspel clearly believed that she was following the law when she authorised these “practices”. She stated that her priorities were well thought out and that she had the authority to make these decisions. Besides, the president, the attorney general, and most members of the US Congress actually ordered them to be done in the name of national security.
But torture is not wrong because it is illegal. Torture is illegal because it is wrong. Classified programmes, oaths of allegiance, and upholding professional conduct will not make an immoral act/programme justifiable – not even when it is deemed perfectly legal by lawmakers such as presidents and senators.
Haspel may be a bureaucrat of remarkable intellect, unswerving loyalty, and self-evident leadership poise, but simply following orders has nothing to do with moral accountability.
Since the Spanish Inquisition, the same tactics used under Haspel’s watch have been considered torture and immoral. Today, this belief has been codified into international law. Torture is wrong because it contaminates the intentions of anyone trying to pursue moral truth.
Trump’s CIA nominee Gina Haspel promises not to restart ‘torture’ tactics, including waterboarding
It does not matter if Gina Haspel believes the CIA always follows the law. Does the CIA follow the truth? We know that she followed orders without questioning them. But does she believe that torture is immoral today? That is the main issue.
George Cassidy Payne, adjunct professor, State University of New York