Advertisement
Advertisement
Hong Kong environmental issues
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Restaurant staff use single-use lunch boxes to pack takeaway food in Jordan, Hong Kong, in January. From April 22 onwards, restaurants cannot offer disposable customers polystyrene products. Photo: Jelly Tse

Letters | Embrace Hong Kong’s plastic ban – for the sake of your own health

  • Readers discuss why the city must break its addiction to plastic, and the focus on the cost of the bags to be used in the waste-charging scheme
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form. Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification
It is time to say goodbye to some disposable plastic items when the first phase of the ban is rolled out on Earth Day on April 22. The move is much needed as plastic tableware is often too contaminated and the items too small to be recycled effectively. But that is not the full extent of the problem.

“The Fraud of Plastic Recycling”, a report by The Centre for Climate Integrity, recently revealed that, for decades, the petrochemical industry has been treating the plastic waste crisis as a public relations issue, instead of a technical or economic challenge. The report accused the industry of promoting plastic recycling as a way to ward off regulations and keep demand growing. Even as countries are negotiating a global treaty on plastic pollution, industry lobbyists are pushing for new solutions like chemical recycling without addressing the core issue – the disposability of single-use plastics.

The reality is that only 9 per cent of all plastic waste generated has been recycled, and our plastic addiction is causing irrevocable change to the environment. For instance, plastic rock complexes – or “plastistones” – have been found across several countries and are being recognised as a novel sedimentary rock by geologists.

Even more worrying is that microplastics and nanoplastics can now be found in our blood, and a study on mice showed that they can penetrate the blood-brain barrier. A recently published study saw a link between their presence in our major arteries and the increased risk of heart attack, stroke or death.

As more jurisdictions embrace the growing global movement towards banning plastics, Hong Kong too must heed the call to protect our environment and ourselves. We already have disposable items made of more sustainable materials, such as paper or wood, available today. Of course, the better option is to stop using disposable items in the first place.

Wendell Chan, senior officer, policy research and advocacy, Friends of the Earth (HK)

Focus on cost of waste-disposal bags misses the point

On April 1, the government launched a trial of the waste-charging scheme. There has been much discussion over whether residents can afford the designated bags in which waste should be discarded and how buildings’ management will enforce the regulation. Sadly, this misses the point.
The underlying purpose of waste charging is “polluter pays”; in other words, you pay for whatever waste you produce. The principle is to avoid this cost in the first place, by becoming more frugal and buying only what you need to conserve resources – it is not about purchasing bags. This is much like with tobacco and alcohol, where if you raise the price, people will think twice before splashing out on these substances which are known to be harmful.

Ultimately, Hong Kong needs to find a more holistic way of dealing with waste, like applying circular economy principles which involve stakeholders along the value chain. Bags alone will not solve the problem. Waste charging has been successfully applied across the globe in other countries, let’s hope we don’t make fools of ourselves this month.

Thomas Tang, Mid-Levels

2