#MoreViralThanTheVirus warns that students are not immune to Covid-19
Riot officers have been criticised over the way they police protests.
Police in Hong Kong are facing accusations of interferring with free speech after it was reported that they have asked Facebook to remove posts containing what they claimed were defamatory or unfounded allegations about their handling of anti-government protests.
The social media giant will not delete any of the posts flagged by police despite two formal requests demanding it do so, which also included a call for the company to surrender all relevant information for investigation.
A message by opposition lawmaker Alvin Yeung Ngok-kiu, of the Civic Party, was among those complained about to Facebook. Yeung said he had simply relayed what television media had reported on the shooting of a student.
Police raised concerns in a letter dated October 9 about posts published the previous month, including one alleging officers harassed a female protester during a car search in Tung Chung.
Another accused police of “killing Hong Kong people” in a campaign urging internet users to file complaints with the White House about what they called “police brutality”.
The force also highlighted a post tagged “live shot fired to kill citizen”, claiming the author of the message had sought to “make up facts” and distort the aim of the police operation.
Many people disagree with the way riot police have handled the protests.
Photo: SCMP/ Edmond So
In its letter, publicly available on its official website, the force said: “As a global social media platform, Facebook absolutely has the responsibility to ensure that contents dispatched by its users are factual and in the public interest.”
Facebook apparently did not heed the police’s demands and the force issued another letter last Thursday, expressing “extreme disappointment” with the company’s inaction.
In the second letter, the force referred to more “defamatory” posts and again insisted Facebook act decisively against “inaccurate reports” and posts that “provoke hatred”.
Henry Chan Wan-hoi, a critic of the Hong Kong government who is described as an online influencer, said the force’s reaction amounted to interference with basic freedoms.
In a post on Tuesday, Chan wrote: “It is an open challenge to press and speech freedoms.”
A police spokeswoman said it was common practice for it to contact organisations and media to set the record straight on untrue or inaccurate reports, and to clarify its position. She declined to comment further.