Hong Kong restaurant that supported anti-government protests insists it will only serve Cantonese speakers

Published: 
South China Morning Post
Listen to this article

Kwong Wing Catering says staff don’t speak Mandarin, in move seen as attempt to deter customers from mainland China

South China Morning Post |
Published: 
Comment

Latest Articles

Hong Kong teams bag top spots at 9th World Championship of Chinese Cuisine

Hong Kong government commended for suspending waste-charging scheme

How venom is milked from Australia’s toxic marine animals to make antivenoms

Hong Kong officials continue search for the owner of a runaway emu

The outside of a Kwong Wing Catering location In Tsim Sha Tsui.

The owners of a Hong Kong restaurant chain who supported anti-government protesters have continued to insist that staff would only serve Hongkongers and "friends from Taiwan", despite being told it was unlawful to do so.

Kwong Wing Catering, which operates a popular chain of local diners, posted notices at several of its outlets late last month that said staff did not speak Mandarin, a stance interpreted as it deterring customers from mainland China during the coronavirus outbreak.

Late on Sunday, the owners said staff would continue to only speak Cantonese, despite the Equal Opportunities Commission advising it to remove the notices.

Opinion: Covid-19 is no excuse for bigotry against mainland Chinese

On Saturday, the restaurant claimed it had been told during a call with the commission that it would be prosecuted if it served some groups of people and not others.

In a Facebook post the owners vented their anger at the Hong Kong government, and repeated their claim that none of their waiters could speak Mandarin.

“I just talked to our district managers, and realised that all our waiters can’t speak Mandarin,” one wrote. “So, from today [Saturday] orders can just be made in Cantonese and they [waiters] will not explain the menu. We are sorry for the inconvenience.”

Key terms about the coronavirus explained 

But on Sunday, the commission denied issuing any sort of warning to the restaurant’s owners.

It said a complaint had been made alleging that the restaurant had put up a notice that was discriminatory towards some customers. It said it called the restaurant and advised it to remove the notice.

“During the call, the officer did not make any sort of warning nor mention suing the restaurant. Any allegations of otherwise, or doubts about the commission’s handling of the matter are misguided,” the statement said.

The commission added that it was unlawful to discriminate against, harass or vilify a person on the grounds of “race”, which referred to the race, colour, descent, national or ethnic origin of the person. Although language was not included in its definition of race, language-related requirements or conditions might result in indirect discrimination against a particular ethnic group, if members of this group were unable to meet those requirements or conditions, and suffer detrimental treatment as a result.

The commission said it understood that the coronavirus, which originated on the mainland, was causing anxiety, but discriminatory language and behaviour would only serve to fuel division and conflict, rather than bringing the epidemic under control.

Sign up for the YP Teachers Newsletter
Get updates for teachers sent directly to your inbox
By registering, you agree to our T&C and Privacy Policy
Comment